Update 'content/topic/against-the-coming-world-of-listening-machines.md'

content/topic/against-the-coming-world-of-listening-machines.md

@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ One way of responding to this possibility would be to simply bracket the questio
 
 Another response would be to say that when or if machines listen, they listen ![operationally](audio:static/audio/andrejevic-on-operationalism.mp3): not in order to understand, or even facilitate human understanding, but to perform an operation: to diagnose, to identify, to recognize, to trigger.[^Faroki, Paglen] And we could notice that as listening becomes increasingly operational sound does too. [Operational acoustics](https://www.trillbit.com/trillbit-home-page.html "Creating the Internet of sound"): sounds made by machines for machine listeners. [Adversarial acoustics](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4XXGDVs0f8 "Adversarial Music Demo Video"): sounds made by machines _against_ human listeners, and vice versa.[^Billy Li]
 
-# Footnotes
+# Resources
 
 [^Cella, Serizel, Ellis]: ![](bib:7c769ce6-5e9e-40d3-96ef-1838a7f57365)
 [^alper]: Meryl Alper, _Giving Voice: Mobile Communication, Disability_, and Inequality (MIT Press, 2017)